Following the economic
downturn caused by the global financial crisis, most economies have focused on
increasing exports in an effort to reduce the widening trade deficits. This has
been no easy fit however, with global demand weakening on the back of a less
than impressive world economic outlook as indicated by forecasts from the
Bretton Woods Institutions.
In fact, the European
Commission forecast a 3% decline in economic activity, with the 17 member
Eurozone bloc`s economy expected to contract by 0, 4% this year and stagnate in
2013. Domestic demand in the Eurozone continues to be muted by the
belt-tightening austerity measures currently being implemented in most of the
Eurozone bloc, meant to maintain a balanced budget. However, since the onset of
the Global Financial Crisis in the last quarter of 2007, China has continued to
be the major driver of the global economy, with the world`s second largest
economy growing at an average of 10 % a year for the past 3 decades.
Nonetheless, declining
global demand has also started having a toll on the economic powerhouse, with
the People`s Bank of China lowering interest rates twice this year and the
Chinese central bank also reducing the Reserve Requirement Ratio, in an effort
to spur growth, driven by increased consumer spending. The weakening global
demand has not only affected China alone, with Japan, the world`s 3rd
biggest economy, currently in a technical recession following two consecutive
quarters of contraction. Home to some of the world`s largest manufacturers such
as Sony, Toyota and Panasonic, Japan has posted trade deficits in 10 of the
last 12 months according to Bloomberg BusinessWeek statistics. This trend has
come on the back of decreasing manufacturing orders, which are an indicator of
capital spending.
Proponents of
export-led recovery have been left with mud on the face, as the recent global
patterns have rebutted the fundamentals of the theory. The interconnectedness
and interdependence of the global economies has a domino effect, implying that
a slowdown in one economy will lead to the rest of the global economies
faltering like deck of cards. This can be evidenced by the case of Germany,
which had largely remained insulated from the economic meltdown in Europe, but
recently, European Central Bank president
has warned of a slowdown in Germany`s economic activity.
The overall impact of
this global weakening in demand obviously has dire effects for Africa`s
economy. Historically, Africa`s economy has been structurally dependant on
primary production although efforts have been made in expanding into both the
secondary and tertiary industries albeit, to a limited extent. Slumps in the
prices of primary commodities have an overreaching effect as most of Africa`s
economies, especially the sub-Saharan economies do not have buffer mechanisms
to withstand such economic shocks.
Not far beyond our
borders, South Africa, the world`s biggest producer of platinum, accounting for
88% percent of the world`s platinum reserves and about three quarters of global
platinum production, has been affected by the dip in platinum prices over the
last year, caused by the decline in demand for platinum by the end users in the
automotive industries, which together with rising labour costs has caused
losses in industry heavyweights like Anglo American Platinum of R256 million in
the first half of 2012. The net effect has been to cut back on spending and
downsizing operations.
Much of this argument
may seem foreign in the Zimbabwean context, given that the Confederation of
Zimbabwean Industries released statistics showing that the capacity utilisation
plummeted from 57, 2% in 2011 to 44, 2% in 2012, and reasons cited for this
include liquidity constraints, erratic utility supplies and inflexible labour
laws. Given all this, Zimbabwean
Industries are faced with the twin challenges of not only figuring out a way to
navigate around the problems of
declining global demand, but also to come up with solutions to increasing
capacity utilisation.
To circumvent the
problem of weakening global demand, the answer may not be as far-fetched as it
may initially seem. The African Development Bank estimates that in the next 20
years, there are going to be 2 billion people in Africa, with at least 1,2
billion people living in urban cities, and of these, 300 million will be
earning about US$20 a day, creating a US$2 trillion market annually. This
implies that significant efforts must be channelled at positioning Zimbabwean
industries to tap into this growing market. We have been witnessing the trend
of increased investment flows into Africa, as companies and investors from
abroad seek to establish a foothold on the continent to have a slice of the
cake. To put it into context, China through China Export-Import Bank earlier
this year pledged up to US$20 billion in loans for infrastructure development
such as dams to generate power, and rail-road networks to improve
accessibility, over a 3 year period with emphasis being placed on trade rather
than aid. It is evident therefore that going forward, the continent will
present a ready market for Zimbabwean industries. The plans to establish a
Pan-African free trade area will all the more add to the allure of the African
continent as a vibrant market.
The weakening global
demand will lead to a ‘survival of the fittest, elimination of the weakest’
type of phenomenon, with manufacturers who cannot produce efficiently, hence
cheaply, being driven out of the market. It is critical therefore for
deliberate efforts aimed at developing infrastructure, technology locally and
improving supply of utilities like electricity and water, to ensure our local
products remain competitive, be implemented. We have already seen the potential
Zimbabwean companies have on the continent, take for example Seedco with a 50%
market share in Malawi, 46% in Zambia and Tanzania, and plans to enter into the
Nigerian and Ghanaian markets next year.
The challenge therefore
would be to increase capacity utilisation and operational efficiency in local
industries. We have to take a long hard look at ourselves as a nation. With all
the capital flows that have been coming onto the African Continent, in the last
decade or so, why have Foreign Direct Investment Inflows into Zimbabwe been meagre,
given the human capital and mineral wealth we have, when other countries which
are not as endowed in skilled human capital and mineral wealth as we are have
enjoyed significant Foreign Direct Investment flows. Various analysts believe
the current uncertain political environment which has been creating ‘noise’ in
the financial markets has kept investors at bay, further giving currency to the
age old adage common amongst private equity investors that, “money does not
like noise.” It follows that, government has to craft policies guaranteeing a
stable business environment, which will act as a catalyst for the much needed
Foreign Direct Investment.
Increasing focus has to
be placed on Small to Medium Enterprises (SMEs), to spur economic recovery.
Industry and Commerce minister, Professor Welshman Ncube suggests that SMEs are
crucial in driving the economy due to their high labour-to-capital ratio, and
as such, can be turned around much cheaply than conventional larger industries.
The role of SMEs is multi-pronged, with benefits in areas such as employment
and poverty reduction and other positive spin-offs of their presence like
increased productivity in the economy. With an ever widening trade deficit, it
is unsustainable for Zimbabwe to continue incurring a high import bill,
importing such basic things like clothes, chickens and such other trinkets.
Support must be given to the SMEs to venture into sustainable agri-business,
Information Communication and Technology which is the country`s fastest growing
sector with tele-density increasing locally and other fast moving consumer
goods sectors which will always have a market as the number of people living in
urban cities and the general level of
affluence increases in the economy.
Indeed, Zimbabwe`s own
version of the ‘New Deal’ is needed to revive the manufacturing sector. Our
competitive advantage lies in the skilled human capital we have. The period
from 2009 to 2011 witnessed a resurgence of our industries albeit a lacklustre
performance in 2012, this indicates however, the potential Zimbabwean
Industries have. Progressive synergies between government, the finance sector and
the industry have to be nurtured so as modernise and shore up the business
environment and attract the much needed funding to revive industry.
There are some analysts
who believe that, perhaps due to the nature under which our local industries
where established in the then Rhodesia, were a policy of self-containment was
being pursued to reduce reliance on imported commodities to counter isolation,
Zimbabwe should shift economic ideologies. The argument is that, our industries
were never built to compete with foreign ones and given that after independence
in 1980, since there was not much capital investment in local industries; they
lack the technological means to produce efficiently. Considering the antiquated machinery local
industries are using, this argument seems to have its merits. It follows
therefore that focus should be shifted to establishing Zimbabwe as an
investment hub by turning it into a tax haven, and establishing the necessary
regulatory and political policies to attract the rise of a robust financial
services sector. Other countries like Dubai and Singapore have gone his route,
and the benefits are there for all to see.
Comments
Post a Comment