Skip to main content

Comrades, you`ve got it all wrong on indigenization

Indigenisation Minister Patrick Zhuwawo
If the Zimbabwean government earned a buck every time the word indigenization was mentioned, the government probably wouldn’t be struggling to pay civil service salaries. That is just how prominent the issue of indigenizing the economy has grown in Zimbabwe over the years. From the time of minister Saviour Kasukuwere vociferously pushing for the nationalization of banks and mines, to the somewhat toned down era of Francis Nhema, it appears we are headed for exciting times, with new indigenization minister Patrick Zhuwawo. His recent showdown with finance minister, Patrick Chinamasa over the implementation of the policy shows how crucial this policy is in the broader national context, but  even more, how incoherent the government`s stance on this issue is.

A logical look at the issue reveals truths that may be unpalatable to some. I put it to you that, indigenization and empowerment is not taking what someone else has worked hard to build in the past and simply giving it to someone else to run.  That simply would promote ‘patrimonial capitalism’ and do the economy a disservice. The issue of indigenization is a thorny issue and evokes a great deal of emotion. However, indigenization and empowerment must be approached with a forward looking lens, and be seen as being a means for enabling people, particularly the youth to start  and efficiently run future businesses in various economic sectors, with the sufficient skills-set. This runs counter of to the current unsustainable model of simply transferring ownership.

Currently, the minerals sector has been the primary target of this policy. But looking at recent trends in this sector – commodity prices are down, it is highly capital intensive and prospects for wide-scale job creation in this sector are low, as technology means that machines will replace human labour – shows that the outlook for this sector in the long term is not that promising. Earnings reports of Zimbabwean mining companies illustrate this point ever so elegantly. Say we indigenize all the mines now and we own them, in the context of the economy, 10-15 years down the line, it will not be surprising to see an economy with high unemployment, low economic output and citizens in an even poorer state of welfare. The point is; policy makers are looking at indigenization incorrectly.

Former South African Reserve Bank governor, Tito Mboweni left tongues wagging even in his own party, the ANC when he publicly said that those calling for the nationalization of mines and banks in South Africa were engaged in the wrong debate altogether. The fact is, sooner or later, Zimbabwe like other states have done, will undergo a structural economic shift that will see the economy turn from its traditional reliance on agriculture and mines to being a more tertiary-leaning economy. And dare I say that this structural change is already underway. So presently, it would appear we are focused on seizing sectors of the economy that, quite frankly will not be all that important in the long term. Imagine Dubai, contending with all its political might to have a tight leash on its oil industry, when its oil reserves are forecast to run out in the next 10 years as they are now… ludicrous right?

Granted, local ownership of the means of production is essential, particularly as efforts are made to redress systems created by Zimbabwe`s colonial past. However, the way the authorities are approaching the issue might need revision.  Instead of maintaining a hardline stance which has evidently impeded smooth capital flows, a futuristic approach to indigenization would do us plenty good.  Revisions of the law itself would allow more foreign capital inflows, which by the way, contrary to minister Zhuwawo`s opinion, the country badly needs. This would enable more economic output in the medium term, all else being equal. The growth would avail even more funds to truly empower small and new businesses of the future, in diversified areas such as alternative power generation, and other modern services by availing capital for growth. This is just but one of the ways the country would stand to benefit from a more rational approach to the indigenization policy. The long and the short of it, is that the government`s current approach of the indigenization policy is myopic and fraught with inconsistencies that will not see the economy benefit at all. One only has to look at Zimbabwe`s economic stalled progress since 2009 to see the merit to this point. While countries such as Mozambique are seeing record capital flows, our indigenization law in its current form, and the way it is being implemented, is hurting the economy.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Black Friday 1997: How the Zimbabwe dollar crashed and tipped the economy over the brink

14 November 1997 – dubbed “Black Friday”-  is a day that will forever be etched in Zimbabwe`s economic history as the cataclysmic point that triggered Zimbabwe`s economic free-fall. Below is a brief chronicle of the events leading up to this seminal day, and what ensued in the aftermaths of Black Friday. In the second decade of its independence, the Zimbabwean government launched an economic reform programme essential in liberalizing the economy and dealing with the structural impediments to growth. However, fiscal policy was weak and monetary policy unsteady during the time period; and the country suffered from two serious droughts (in 1992 and 1995), which affected Zimbabwe’s agriculture, its primary economic industry. A land reform had been a highly contentious issue since independence, as the majority of prime agricultural land was owned by about 4,000 white commercial farmers; while the indigenous population continued to engage in subsistence farming. In the first five y...

The story behind the iconic Meikles Hotel and its founder Thomas Meikle

Old Meikles Hotel Buidling 1924: Credit - Meikles Hotel Twitter Feed The 15 th of November marks the 102 nd anniversary of Meikles hotel, a hotel founded by Thomas Meikle, following on a vision he shared with his brother Stewart, of establishing a hotel on the influential site overlooking Cecil Square (now called Africa Unity Square, in the heart of then Rhodesia`s capital city, Salisbury. Meikles hotel was officially opened on November 15, 1915, on the site which now houses ZB Life Towers, along Jason Moyo avenue in Harare and currently has a capacity of over 535 bedrooms. Meikles hotel holds the honour of being the first Zimbabwean hotel to attain the coveted 5-star rating, a feat it achieved in August 1983. Hotel grading was introduced in Zimbabwe in 1968, and the first results were announced in 1969. At the time, no local hotels received 4-stars, however the Ambassador Hotel, Jameson Hotel and Park Lane Hotel (now the GMB Headquarters) received 3 stars each. Interes...

Securitising Zimbabwe`s Minerals: A Case Study

Abstract Following the dollarization of the Zimbabwean economy in 2009, the country has seen its economic fundamentals improve. Inflation has been reigned in, and the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth has been on an upward trajectory. However, Zimbabwe`s total external debt overhang continues to stifle the recovery of the country`s economy, as investors are not willing to lend to the country, and this has had adverse effects on the country`s Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) flows. Zimbabwe`s external debt overhang is currently estimated at around US$10.7 billion, which is a gigantic, 111% of the country`s GDP. IMF Report, (2012) To circumvent the problem of external debt, which continues to be a major impediment to the economic recovery of the country, various scholars have put forward several solutions which include, declaring Zimbabwe as a Highly Indebted Poor Country (HIPC), and securitisation of the country`s mineral resources. This study looks at securitisation of...