Skip to main content

Zimbabwe: A Nation Where A Father`s Retirement Plan Is His Children







With most if not all efforts focused on the now, for a considerable number of Zimbabweans, thinking about their economic future is an afterthought. Make no mistake about it; it is not by choice that people are leaving their economic future to fate. The present economic realities- a legacy of the 1998-2008 economic meltdown-simply dictate that survival is the rule of the game. With evidence suggesting that people are just ‘getting by’, the good old principle of saving for retirement, investments and for that rainy day has now become a flight of fancy.

Most Zimbabweans are barely scrapping by and can hardly afford the basic necessities. For the purposes of this argument, let us exclude the highly contested unemployed figures (Zimstats-the National Statistical Agency- pegs this figure at 11% whilst the World Food Programme and other international organisations estimate that the rate is somewhere in the region of 85%). When one looks at that section of Zimbabweans who are employed, 30.6 % of these earn less than $100 per month according to statistics released by Zimstats. The same report also shows that at least 87.4% of employed persons earn less than $450 a month. What these statistics show is the prevalence of poverty in the country as effectively, most people fall well below the Poverty Datum Line (PDL) which is northwards of $500 for an average household of six.

We can conclude therefore that the average Zimbabwean consumer is over extended financially, and unless they augment their primary income somehow, making ends meet becomes somewhat of a herculean task. It becomes very difficult to see how people can meaningfully save for their future years beyond formal employment. Looking comparatively at the country`s Gross National Income per capita- a measure of the average wealth per person- standing at $615 at the end of 2013, one can see how relatively poor than their other sub-Saharan Africa peers Zimbabweans are. Be that as it may, locals consume just as about the same as their considerably wealthier neighbours as evidenced by Consumption per capita statistics. This reflects the low propensity Zimbabweans have towards savings at best and an entirely non-existent savings culture at worst.

This leads to the question of how the people will make it in say 20 years` time when they retire from work, in the absence of adequate savings. Normally, in cognisance of their working career coming to an end through either reaching retirement age or God forbid, something as unfortunate as retrenchment, one would regularly set aside money in an investment account to see them through retirement. In Zimbabwe though, the scenario described above is the exception rather than the norm. Of course, workers here contribute to the National Social Security Association (NSSA)-the statutory body mandated to pay out pension benefits-, but past occurrences have highlighted the frailties of NSSA in paying out workers in their retirement. There have been documented cases of people who have worked for decades receiving monthly pay-outs of as little as $40 a month from NSSA.

Most would agree that this makes a compelling case for people to set aside money in other investment portfolios to cushion them in their future years. Quite, yet a survey carried out by Finscope revealed that 31% of Zimbabweans do not put aside money as savings. Of the small population that does save, an estimated 27% keep their savings at home, which is not surprising given the low levels of financial inclusion in the country. According to that same survey, the main reasons for savings are largely related to short term consumption needs like education and medical expenses. This obviously means that long term savings for things like retirement remain subdued.

As stated earlier, this phenomenon is largely a result of a sluggish economy, where people have low disposable incomes. No matter how much people want to save money for investment purposes, retirement and for the odd rainy day, they simply cannot afford to. In trying to cover the living essentials, they find their hard earned money gone with little else to spare. Then to a lesser extent are those who can manage to put aside something but do not either due to their distrust of local financial institutions or just generally a lack of a saving culture.

So the long and the short of it, is that Zimbabwean workers are overextended, earning little when the demands on their static incomes are rising. The financial future of many is heavily compromised in this pressing economy. A safer bet to ensure a reasonably comfortable future in retirement, would be to invest in one`s children, spend whatever little earns on a good education for them, and hope that in old age, one`s children would provide a financial cushion when the economy improves. With the way education is valued in the country, as evidenced by Zimbabwe`s high literacy rates, an investment in the education of one`s children, could be the most profitable. Less than ideal, yes! Taboo even, but if the economic trends remain as they are, this could very well be the reality people face in their retirement years. It would be an era where most Zimbabweans` retirement plan, would be nothing but simply their children.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Black Friday 1997: How the Zimbabwe dollar crashed and tipped the economy over the brink

14 November 1997 – dubbed “Black Friday”-  is a day that will forever be etched in Zimbabwe`s economic history as the cataclysmic point that triggered Zimbabwe`s economic free-fall. Below is a brief chronicle of the events leading up to this seminal day, and what ensued in the aftermaths of Black Friday. In the second decade of its independence, the Zimbabwean government launched an economic reform programme essential in liberalizing the economy and dealing with the structural impediments to growth. However, fiscal policy was weak and monetary policy unsteady during the time period; and the country suffered from two serious droughts (in 1992 and 1995), which affected Zimbabwe’s agriculture, its primary economic industry. A land reform had been a highly contentious issue since independence, as the majority of prime agricultural land was owned by about 4,000 white commercial farmers; while the indigenous population continued to engage in subsistence farming. In the first five years

The story behind the iconic Meikles Hotel and its founder Thomas Meikle

Old Meikles Hotel Buidling 1924: Credit - Meikles Hotel Twitter Feed The 15 th of November marks the 102 nd anniversary of Meikles hotel, a hotel founded by Thomas Meikle, following on a vision he shared with his brother Stewart, of establishing a hotel on the influential site overlooking Cecil Square (now called Africa Unity Square, in the heart of then Rhodesia`s capital city, Salisbury. Meikles hotel was officially opened on November 15, 1915, on the site which now houses ZB Life Towers, along Jason Moyo avenue in Harare and currently has a capacity of over 535 bedrooms. Meikles hotel holds the honour of being the first Zimbabwean hotel to attain the coveted 5-star rating, a feat it achieved in August 1983. Hotel grading was introduced in Zimbabwe in 1968, and the first results were announced in 1969. At the time, no local hotels received 4-stars, however the Ambassador Hotel, Jameson Hotel and Park Lane Hotel (now the GMB Headquarters) received 3 stars each. Interes

Covid-19 USD civil service allowances: Another money printing dalliance?

Government is the country`s largest employer, and by implication influences the spending patterns of large swathes of consumers. Establishing the exact number of civil servants under its employ is an imprecise endeavour. In an interview in August 2019, finance minister Mthuli Ncube noted that the total government payroll was about 400,000 individuals a month. Separately, some estimates put the total number of civil servants excluding those in the security forces at 250,000. Meanwhile, a 2019, Labour Force survey by ZimStat, reveals that some 249,000 people, representing 2% of the population, receive a monthly pension or some social security funds. A conservative estimate would thus arrive at a monthly amount of at least US$37.8 million, that government will be paying its workers, as part of the recently announced COVID-19 allowances, running until August 2020.  Converted at the ruling interbank rate of 57, this translates